USD 435 School Enhancement Plan
Curriculum
Area: 9-12 Mathematics
Goal: All AHS Math students will improve their skills on Kansas Math Indicator 2.2.k3c: Òsolves systems of linear equations with two unknowns using integer coefficients and constants,Ó without the use of a calculator.
|
|
Long Term Goal Ð more than one year |
|
Schoolwide Initiative |
|
X |
Short Term Goal Ð one year |
X |
Grade Level or Content Area Initiative |
Steps to Achieve Goal Timeline Person
in charge
|
Pre-Algebra and Special Education: Pre test (Solving single linear equations w/o calc) |
January 2008 |
Casteel, Klein |
|
Pre-Algebra and Special Education: Spiraled instruction and practice |
Jan Ð May, 2008 |
Casteel, Klein |
|
Pre-Algebra and Special Education: Post test (Solving single linear equations w/o calc) |
May 2008 |
Casteel, Klein |
|
Alg 1, Geo, Alg 2: Pretest (Solving systems w/o calculator) |
January 2008 |
Cook, Geist, Stredney |
|
Alg 1, Geo, Alg 2: Spiraled instruction and practice |
Jan Ð Mar, 2008 |
Cook, Geist, Stredney |
|
Alg 1, Geo, Alg 2: Post Test |
March 2008 |
Cook, Geist, Stredney |
|
Courses beyond Alg 2: students challenged with no calculator experiences |
throughout year |
Cook, Geist, Stredney |
|
|
|
|
Data to show we achieved the goal (at least two forms of data required) Baseline Results
|
2007 State Math Assessment (9th/10th/11th) |
73.3/52.5/40.2 |
|
|
2008 Pretest for this indicator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Results should be recorded at the end of the term identified above and sent to the local School Enhancement Chair for posting. If additional documentation is needed please attach)
Staff Development Needed Possible Location Expected Costs
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources Needed Where Expected Costs
|
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
1) Possible data sources can include assessment scores from MAP or State assessments, locally developed assessments that will show the change, locally developed Rubrics to show implementation and change, portfolios, focus groups, observation toolsÉ..
2) When goals are completed it doesnÕt necessarily mean they are dropped. They should be engrained in instruction that it no longer needs to be a goal for implementation to occur.