USD 435 School Enhancement Plan
Curriculum
Area: Science
Goal: To increase scores on the state science assessment concerning Standard 2: Physical Science (Basic structure of the atom) Note: Data was complied from 2001, 2003 and 2005 state science assessment but these tests were using 2001 standards. (2A.1.3, 2A.1.4 and 2A 2.2)
|
|
Long Term Goal Ð more than one year |
|
Schoolwide Initiative |
|
X |
Short Term Goal Ð one year |
X |
Grade Level or Content Area Initiative |
Steps to Achieve Goal Timeline Person
in charge
|
Expand the teaching time and content of the structure of the atom. |
2nd 9 weeks |
Bonar/Miller |
|
Chemistry teacher will collaborate with general science teachers and assist student learning during the structure of the atom unit. |
2nd 9 weeks |
Padgett/Bonar/Miller |
|
Review question on the Kansas science assessment for discrepancies in terminology, vocabulary used, etc. |
1st 9 weeks |
Padgett/Heintz/Bonar/Miller Sweeney |
|
Examine the need for a class project that emphasizes these standards. |
1st 9 weeks |
Padgett/Bonar/Miller |
|
Introduce relevant vocabulary words and complete a pre- and post-test using these terms. |
1st 9 weeks |
Bonar/Miller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data to show we achieved the goal (at least two forms of data required) Baseline Results
|
Local assessments |
2006-2007 semester finals |
|
|
Kansas state science assessment scores (expecially standard 2) |
2005 KS science assessment scores |
|
|
|
|
|
(Results should be recorded at the end of the term identified above and sent to the local School Enhancement Chair for posting. If additional documentation is needed please attach)
Staff Development Needed Possible Location Expected Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources Needed Where Expected Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
1) Possible data sources can include assessment scores from MAP or State assessments, locally developed assessments that will show the change, locally developed Rubrics to show implementation and change, portfolios, focus groups, observation toolsÉ..
2) When goals are completed it doesnÕt necessarily mean they are dropped. They should be engrained in instruction that it no longer needs to be a goal for implementation to occur.